Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CERIGO et al v. MCKENNA et al
as 2:2023cv04311
Plaintiff:
THEO CERIGO and NANCY SMITH
Defendant:
CASSEY MCKENNA, GABRIEL MOREANO, EUGENE LUGTU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jeffrey Kearns v. LoanDepot.com, LLC
as 8:2022cv01217
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Kearns
Defendant:
LOANDEPOT.COM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Jeffrey Gilbert v. USA
as 16-3692
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY KEARNS GILBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Musaddiq Ahmad v. Norman Glover, et al
as 16-3386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MUSADDIQ AHMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
NORMAN DOUGLAS GLOVER, DET. MEGAN CONNELL, #182, DET. ROBERT TILL, #149 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
OFFICER CLYDE WASHINGTON, #262
AHMAD v. HUDSON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE NARCOTICS TASK FORCE et al
as 2:2015cv08994
Plaintiff:
MUSADDIQ AHMAD
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE NARCOTICS TASK FORCE, NORMAN DOUGLAS GLOVER, JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILBERT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00243
Petitioner:
JEFFREY KEARNS GILBERT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jeffrey Gilbert v. T. Sniezek
as 10-1214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY KEARNS GILBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
T. R. SNIEZEK
Gilbert v. Sniezek
as 3:2009cv02540
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Kearns Gilbert
Respondent:
T. R. Sniezek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
