Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Palmer v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03719
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Palmer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PALMER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv28993
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY PALMER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Palmer v. Watson
as 4:2022cv01958
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Palmer
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roshune Carelock v. Jeff Johnson
as 22-1352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSHUNE LEMARR CARELOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF JOHNSON, LYNETTE PATTON, WILLIAM BARNES and others
Defendant:
TRACY BLACK, NATALIE GAMBLE, MR. CHARLES and others
PALMER v. OBERLANDER et al
as 2:2021cv02189
Petitioner:
JEFFREY PALMER
Respondent:
DEREK OBERLANDER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carelock v. Palmer et al
as 5:2020cv01833
Defendant:
Tiffany Jones, Jason Miles, Sharon Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Roshune Lemarr Carelock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carelock v. Johnson et al
as 5:2020cv01635
Defendant:
Tiffany Jones, Lynnette Patton, Sharon Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Roshune Lemarr Carelock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimberly Cole, et al v. NIBCO Inc
as 19-2053
Defendant / Appellee:
NIBCO INC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KIMBERLY COLE
Not Yet Classified:
JEFFREY PALMER
PALMER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2019cv00030
Petitioner:
JEFFREY PALMER
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Savage v. Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest et al
as 6:2018cv00190
Defendant:
Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest and Jeffrey Palmer
Plaintiff:
raymond savage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
