Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv81514
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY R ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Damien Mikell v. Louis Folino, et al
as 17-1049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIEN MIKELL
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO, Fomer Superintendent 2, ROBERT GILMORE, Former Superintendent 1, JEFFREY R. ROGERS, Corrections Classifiation adn Program Manager and others
Rogers v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02225
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R. Rogers
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv27169
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R. Rogers
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:14-cv-27169
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R. Rogers
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Craig Williams v. Sec PA Dept Corrections, et al
as 14-1469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG WILLIAMS, PADRP
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DORINA VARNER, Chief Grievance Coordinator, TINA FRIDAY, Records Officer, in her Individual and Official Capacity and others
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2012cv00944
Plaintiff:
CRAIG WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, DORINA VARNER, TINA FRIDAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. PA DEPT. OF CORRS. et al
as 2:2010cv01599
Plaintiff:
FRANK RIVERA
Defendant:
PA DEPT. OF CORRS., JEFFREY A. BEARD, TIMOTHY I. MARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2010cv00235
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFREY A. BEARD, TIMOTHY I. MARK and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
