Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 193
Derrick Jones, et al v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al
as 24-1912
Plaintiff: Derrick Jones, Jerome Jones, Darnell Rusan and others
Defendant: City of St. Louis, Missouri, Lieutenant Javan Fowlkes, in his individual capacity, Correctional Officer Aisha Turner, in her individual capacity and others
USA v. Jones
as 24-30259
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Jerome Jones
Jones v. Armor Healthcare et al
as 3:2024cv00350
Plaintiff: Ronnie Jerome Jones
Defendant: Armor Healthcare and Linda Heilman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mikwan Jerome Jones v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv10420
Plaintiff: Mikwan Jerome Jones
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
United States v. Jones
as 23-6187
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: LOUIS JEROME JONES
Jones v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2023cv04219
Plaintiff: Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant: Bobby Lumpkin, Boyd Unit and Major Skeggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Martinez et al
as 3:2023cv02310
Plaintiff: Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant: NFN Martinez, Homosexual Vaughn, Prupertyrn Short and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Gruver et al
as 3:2023cv02264
Petitioner: Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent: Major NFN Gruver, NFN Clark, Ms J Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01868
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Clark et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01841
Plaintiff: Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant: Mr J Clark, Mr D Skeggs, Mr M Gruver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?