Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Heaven v. Ocala Police Department
as 5:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Jerome Heaven, Jr and Jerome Young
Defendant:
Ocala Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Young v. Curry
as 2:2022cv01448
Plaintiff:
Danny Jerome Young
Defendant:
P. Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young, et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Jerome and Teresa Young, Jerome Young and Teresa Young
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv20612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Danny Jerome Young v. Daniel E. Cueva
as 2:2020cv08304
Respondent:
Daniel E. Cueva
Petitioner:
Danny Jerome Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eric Bates, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 19-17094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE LEWELLING, JOHNSON MANDAZ, JOHNNY O. SANCHEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Former Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, CARL WOFFORD, Warden, Avenal State Prison, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Former Governer of the State of California and others
YOUNG v. ALL SERVICE BUILDING MANAGEMENT CORP et al
as 1:2017cv00250
Plaintiff:
JEROME YOUNG
Defendant:
ALL SERVICE BUILDING MANAGEMENT CORP, SERVICEMASTER CONTRACT SERVICES BY UVEGES and RYAN UVEGES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-10109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gerald Young v. Sandra Pennywell
as 14-55438
Petitioner - Appellant:
GERALD JEROME YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee:
SANDRA PENNYWELL
Gerald Jerome Young v. Sandra Pennywell
as 2:2013cv02497
Respondent:
Sandra Pennywell
Petitioner:
Gerald Jerome Young
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
