Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 21-1085
Defendant:
MARK ARGIR, Correction Officer, FCI Berlin, KEVIN RAMSAY, Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, NH, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, NH, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Interested Party:
BRIAN PATTERSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
AIKEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS DIRECTOR et al
as 1:2020cv02091
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS DIRECTOR, JERROD GRIMES and DAVID R. WILSON
Plaintiff:
SHAWNTA AIKEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRIMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv40288
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JERROD GRIMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRIMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv32522
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JERROD GRIMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Wilson et al
as 1:2018cv00416
Plaintiff:
Carmen Johnson
Defendant:
David Wilson, Jerrod Grimes, Barbara Rickard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 17-1292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Defendant:
MICHELLE GONYEA, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Ray Brook, f/k/a FNU Gaunyea, FNU KUZNECOW, (first name unknown) Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, K. LEWIS, Physician's Assistant, FCI Berlin and others
Defendant - Appellee:
E. L. TATUM, Warden, FCI Berlin, a/k/a Esker Lee Tatum, DAN SULLIVAN, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Berlin, WANDA MULLINS, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin and others
Interested Party:
BRIAN PATTERSON
Widi v. USA et al
as 1:2016fp00445
Defendant:
Mark Argir, Cory Balinas, B. Beegle and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Widi, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
