Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv05134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMAS v. ADAMS et al
as 4:2025cv00098
Plaintiff:
MARCIA THOMAS
Defendant:
BRITTNEY ADAMS, JACK CAMBELL, MARK LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Moss, et al.
as 3:2024cv02212
Plaintiff:
Keisha L. Holmes
Defendant:
Judge Jim Anderson, Officer Slutterbeck, Shaun Hegarty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
No Tan Lines Republik v. Anderson et al
as 2:2024cv00870
Plaintiff:
No Tan Lines Republik
Defendant:
Jim Anderson, Jeanine D'Errico and G Murrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shreves v. Godfrey, et al.
as 24-1692
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Defendant:
DEMETRIC GODFREY, CRYSTAL THOMPSON, BRIAN GOOTKIN and others
Catapano v. Keating et al
as 2:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Caesar Angelo Catapano and Gais Eyoun Al sound
Defendant:
Kevin P. Keating, Jim Anderson and James McKenney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shreves v. Godfrey, et al.
as 23-4077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Defendant / Appellee:
DEMETRIC GODFREY, CRYSTAL THOMPSON, BRIAN GOOTKIN and others
Shreves v. Godfrey et al
as 6:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Shreves
Defendant:
Demetric Godfrey, Crystal Thompson, Brian Gootkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon et al v. Chevron USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2023pq01524
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Jim Anderson Dixon, Jr and Nellie Mae Dixon
Defendant:
Chevron USA, Inc., Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eddy v. Prater et al
as 5:2021cv00302
Defendant:
David Brown, Jim Anderson, Board of County Commissioners County of Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
Jess Q Eddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
