Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kenneth Dunn v. Leo Schmitz, et al
as 22-1732
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH DUNN
Defendant / Appellee:
LEO P. SCHMITZ, JOANN JOHNSON and ISAIAH VEGA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vidurek et al v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2018cv00392
Plaintiff:
Cerus Maarten, Michelle Frioco, Michael Anthony Livecche, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, Assemblyman Carl E. Heastie and John J. Flanagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-35022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Hamm v. Ventura Department of Child, et al
as 17-55605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES A. HAMM
Defendant - Appellee:
VENTURA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF VENTURA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES and others
Dunn v. Schmitz et al
as 3:2016cv03308
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dunn
Defendant:
Leo P Schmitz, JoAnn Johnson and Isaiah Vega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles A. Hamm et al v. Ventura Department of Child Support Services et al
as 2:2016cv08381
Defendant:
Edmund G Brown, Shanna J Burcar, California Department of Child Support Services and others
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Hamm, Eva Hamm and Olie Hamm
Edison v. AVALON CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC et al
as 4:2016cv00683
Plaintiff:
Darrell Edison
Defendant:
Avalon Correctional Services, Inc., Avalon Treatment Services, LLC, ACS Corrections of Texas, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
