Cases 31 - 40 of 669
Morrison v. Biden
as 5:2024cv00274
Petitioner:
Phillip Morrison
Respondent:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Cato v. Biden et al
as 5:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Avery Cato
Defendant:
President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris and FBI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHOES et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
SHOES and M. Alicea X.
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Garner Correctional Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Taylor v. Biden et al
as 2:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant:
Joseph (Joe) Biden, Democratic Party and Oregon Democratic Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boutros v. Bush et al
as 3:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Zinia Ezzet Boutros
Defendant:
George Bush, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Nissen v. Biden
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Michael James Nissen
Defendant:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antar v. Shea et al
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Theodora F. Antar
Defendant:
Michael P Shea, Omar A. Williams, State of Connecticut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 & Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as United Emrits of America
Defendant:
President Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, The White House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Morgan v. Biden
as 1:2024cv00205
Petitioner:
C. Wayne Morgan, Charles Wayne Morgan and C. Wayn Morgan
Respondent:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
