Cases 1 - 10 of 153
Vaughn v. Maness et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Clarence Vaughn
Defendant:
Blake Maness, John Michael Hill, David Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Hill
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Samboy et al
as 2:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
John T. Hill
Defendant:
Carisa Samboy, Tweed and Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
John T. Hill
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Doe (Nurse) et al
as 2:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
John T. Hill
Defendant:
Jane Doe (Nurse), (Nurse) Jane Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Baron et al
as 2:2023cv00497
Plaintiff:
John T. Hill
Defendant:
Joe Baron, Norfolk City Sheriff Office and Norfolk City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill et al v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv01957
Plaintiff:
John A. Hill and Jean J. Hill
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Sines et al v. Kessler et al
as 3:2017cv00072
Defendant:
Matthew Heimbach, Nationalist Front, Augustus Sol Invictus and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 3, Marissa Blair, John Doe and others
Petitioner:
David Duke, James Hart Stern, Denise Y. Lunsford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HILL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22492
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIAM HILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. Baron et al
as 2:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
John T. Hill
Defendant:
Joe Baron, WellPath and Mrs. Samboy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
