Cases 1 - 8 of 8
CHASE v. COSTLOW et al
as 1:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L CHASE
Defendant:
FREDERICK F COSTLOW, CITY OF BANGOR, JOHN C NIVISON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bishop v. Samuels et al
as 5:2015cv01782
Plaintiff:
Daniel-Ralph Bishop
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr, Jeffrey Grondolsky, J L Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nobrega v. Woodcock, et al
as 13-1625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOMINGOS NOBREGA, a/k/a Domingus Nubrega
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES LAWRENCE MCCARTHY and JOHN A. WOODCOCK
Brown v. State of Maine, et al
as 12-2437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG ALAN BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MAINE, GEOFFREY RUSHLAU, individually and in his official capacity as Knox County District Attorney, LINDSAY JONES, individually and in her official capacity as Knox County District Attorney and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. SCHNEIDER, individually and in his official capacity as Maine Attorney General, ROBERT PERKINS, individually and in his official capacity as Assistant Attorney General, JOHN ROBERTS, individually and in his official capacity as Assistant Attorney General and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Murphy v. McAliffe et al
as 4:2009cv00440
Plaintiff:
Carol Ann Murphy
Defendant:
Steven J McAliffe, James R Muirhead, John A Woodcock, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOODCOCK v. A.M. LOCKETT & COMPANY, LTD. et al
as 2:2008cv78960
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. WOODCOCK, JOHN L. WOODCOCK and JOHN L. WOODCOCK
Defendant:
A.M. LOCKETT & COMPANY, LTD., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
