Cases 101 - 110 of 174
Dennis Campbell, et al v. US Dept of Labor
as 13-3719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS JOHN CAMPBELL and MINDY JAYE ZIED-CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Dennis Campbell, et al v. FBI
as 13-3717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS JOHN CAMPBELL and MINDY JAYE ZIED-CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Campbell v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02693
Plaintiff:
John Campbell
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Inc and Wright Medical Group Inc
Campbell v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20865
Plaintiff:
John Campbell
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Campbell v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as OHN/1:13-dp-20865
Plaintiff:
John Campbell
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Campbell v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as 9:2013cv80688
Plaintiff:
John Campbell
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Campbell v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as FLS/9:13-cv-80688
Plaintiff:
John Campbell
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Wanda Williams, et al v. Governor of Pennsylvania, et al
as 13-1896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WANDA R.D. WILLIAMS, EUGENIA SMITH, BRAD KOPLINSKI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA and WILLIAM B. LYNCH
Reed v. Byrnes et al
as 2:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reed
Defendant:
Donna Byrnes, Garvin, Rebecca Dyson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
