Cases 31 - 40 of 30,874
Kenneth Creel v. Gary Junker
as 24-6449
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RAY CREEL
Defendant:
GARY JUNKER, DR. ARTHUR CAMPBELL, DEBRA FITZGERALD and others
Watson v. Doe et al
as 5:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Pierre Terron Watson
Defendant:
John Doe, S. Jones, A. Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hill v. Reuter et al
as 2:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Demetrius G Hill
Defendant:
Scott Reuter, City of Decatur Illinois, K.G. Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpkins v. Wissinger et al
as 5:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins
Defendant:
FNU Wissinger, FNU McCatherian, Edward Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04085
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Cody Waterkotte, Jason Chenoweth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Budney v. SCDC Director of Prisons et al
as 6:2024cv02880
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Budney
Defendant:
SCDC Director of Prisons, Charlie Anderson, Mrs. Fripp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Cox v. Commissioner Of Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2024cv01683
Plaintiff:
Samuel I. Cox
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Department of Human Services, Sara Kulas, Jane/John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Scott County et al
as 4:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Mark Lee Jackson
Defendant:
Scott County, Tim Lane and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Budney v. SCDC Director of Prisons et al
as 6:2024cv02879
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Budney
Defendant:
SCDC Director of Prisons, Kershaw Warden, Kershaw Grievance Coordinator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
