Cases 51 - 60 of 30,874
HAMMOND v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
MARQUEZ HAMMOND
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01233
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Lieutenant Blake, Lieutenant Chiggy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeude v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv01227
Plaintiff:
Todd Jeude
Defendant:
USA, United States Marshalls Service, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Aoun et al
as 9:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Darnell Green
Defendant:
Aoun and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesolek v. Erie County Holding Center et al
as 1:2024cv03521
Plaintiff:
Justin Wesolek
Defendant:
Erie County Holding Center, Eric County Sheriff Department, Kathy Hochul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Frisina et al
as 1:2024cv03558
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
D. Frisina, S. Jackson, Phil Melecio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOMBARDO v. EVANS et al
as 5:2024cv01999
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant:
BRANDON T. EVANS, JENNA MARIE PLISZAR, KEVIN SAMUEL SANTOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Crawford et al
as 4:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Dante Burton
Defendant:
C.O. Crawford, C.O. Cebrick, Unit Manager Grohowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Williams v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Williams
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
