Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 30,869
Tolliver v. Barker et al.
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff: Hiram Tolliver
Defendant: D. R. Barker, K. L. Ross, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jean-Marie v. Popkin et al
as 3:2024cv00821
Plaintiff: Christopher Jean-Marie
Defendant: Dean Popkin, John Doe, Blawie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff: Curtis L. Jones
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Woodside et al
as 3:2024cv01213
Plaintiff: Darrion Brown
Defendant: Lt Woodside, C/O Cook, Pinckneyville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rico Sanders v. Tony Evers, et al
as 24-1774
Plaintiff: RICO SANDERS
Defendant: TONY EVERS, KEVIN CARR and JANE OR JOHN DOE
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff: JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant: R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norfleet v. Charlotte County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv00425
Plaintiff: Tino A. Norfleet
Defendant: Charlotte County Sheriff's Office, Officer Tucker, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCARY v. SIMCOX et al
as 2:2024cv01922
Plaintiff: CAMERON MCCARY
Defendant: CODY SIMCOX, JOHN DOE, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff: Michael R. Coleman
Defendant: John Doe
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annamalai v. BOP et al
as 3:2024cv01207
Plaintiff: Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant: BOP, USA, S Holem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?