Cases 1 - 10 of 24
McConico et al v. Village of Carol Stream et al
as 1:2024cv01654
Plaintiff:
Kyenna McConico and Barnes Kennetha
Defendant:
Village of Carol Stream and Village of Carol Stream Police Officers John Doe #1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brinkman v. Cline et al
as 2:2022cv01270
Plaintiff:
Rand A Brinkman, Jr
Defendant:
Officer Jeffrey Cline, John Does 1-6 and Kenneth Olstinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINLEY v. DOES 1-6
as 2:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
SHAUN ERIC MCKINLEY
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rhone et al v. Polfliet et al
as 1:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Antwan Rhone and Keith Grigsby
Defendant:
P.O. Daniel Polfliet, P.O. John Doe 1-6, Village of Willowbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCHMITT v. DOE 1-6 et al
as 3:2021cv00051
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-2, AMY BRADY, KATRINA SANDERS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ROSS SCHMITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Slabon v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 19-1072
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOES 1-6, Unknown Correctional Officers, OFFICER JONES, THOMAS J. DART and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW SLABON
Slabon v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv05914
Plaintiff:
Andrew Slabon
Defendant:
John Doe 1-6, Booker, Swanigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams Bey v. State of Illinois et al
as 4:2018cv04148
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Michael L Tyus, Administrative Review Board and others
Plaintiff:
Montez R Williams Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiley v. Johnson et al
as 1:2018cv01095
Plaintiff:
Keithus Wiley
Defendant:
John Doe 1-6 and Eddie Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. U.S. Marshal's Service Agency et al
as 3:2017cv01288
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Holloway, III
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal's Service Agency and John Doe #1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
