Cases 81 - 90 of 564
Daniel Cook v. Erica Huss, et al
as 22-1498
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL LEE COOK
Defendant / Appellee:
ERICA HUSS, JOHN DAVIDS, Warden, ROBERT VASHAW, Deputy Warden and others
Daniel Cook v. Erica Huss, et al
as 22-1440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL LEE COOK
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DAVIDS, Warden, ERICA HUSS, ROBERT VASHAW, Deputy Warden and others
Phillip Bloodworth v. Mark Pouperd, et al
as 22-3445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP BLOODWORTH
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER MARK POUPERD, JOHN DOE 1, 1st Shift Commander, CORRECTION OFFICER FORD and others
Brown v. FBOP et al
as 6:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
D'Andre Roland Brown
Defendant:
FBOP, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Schmuker v. Deutchman et al
as 2:2022cv10889
Plaintiff:
Amber Schmuker
Defendant:
Cara Deutchman, Sun Yoon Yang, Iesha Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Farley et al v. Potter et al (TV2)
as 3:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Chad Farley and Jessica Farley
Defendant:
Wayne Potter, Teddy Bales, Lonnie Larue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perry v. Erdos et al
as 1:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Perry
Defendant:
Ronald Erdos, Lieutenant Fry, Officer Robert Dofflemyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendrick v. Chamber-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Mark Kendrick
Defendant:
Annette Chamber-Smith, Ronald T. Erdos, Linnea Mahlman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinegar v. London, Kentucky et al
as 6:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Cody M. Brinegar
Defendant:
London, Kentucky, Laurel County, Kentucky, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv10631
Plaintiff:
Benjamen Hill
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Kyle Echler, Jennifer Hern and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
