Cases 31 - 40 of 64
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Hylton, et al
as 16-5062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Hylton, CDUSM, Proctor, Deputy U.S. Marshal, Anderson, D/S and others
Bey v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv00731
Plaintiff:
Damien G. Bey
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, John Doe One, John Doe Two and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curt Lockett v. John Doe, et al
as 15-12580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURT MARQUAIN LOCKETT
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, TWO FOUR EIGHT, CHO N. SANCHEZ, Gulf CI Chief Health Officer, PRAY, Officer Formerly John Doe One, a.k.a. Prey and others
Hempstead v. Clark et al
as 3:2015cv00374
Plaintiff:
Harold Hempstead
Defendant:
Roland Clark, Cesar, Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jesse L Youngblood v. Lori R DiCarlo et al
as 5:2015cv00249
Defendant:
1-100 Does, Lori R DiCarlo, John Doe (five) and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse L Youngblood
Hempstead v. Colon et al
as 3:2015cv00130
Plaintiff:
Harold Hempstead
Defendant:
Colon, John Doe One, McGrutter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youngblood v. DiCarlo et al
as 3:2014cv02817
Plaintiff:
Jesse L. Youngblood
Defendant:
Lori R. DiCarlo, John Doe (one), John Doe (two) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berryhill v. LaGrange, et al
as 14-6156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
VICKI MILES LAGRANGE, U.S. District Judge, LEE R. WEST, District Director, U.S. District Judge, ROBIN CAUTHRON, District Director, U.S. District Judge and others
Green v. Schofield et al
as 2:2013cv02715
Plaintiff:
James Green
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Stanley Dickerson, Robert Munford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryidu-X v. Stouffer
as 1:2013cv01398
Plaintiff:
Ryidu-X M. Malcom
Defendant:
J. Michael Stouffer, John Wolfe, John Doe One and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
