Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Renfrow-Harris v. Harris et al
as 2:2023cv00172
Defendant:
Steven Burke Fall, Michelle Castendra, Joshua Clinton Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Joslyn Marie Renfrow-Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hart v. Brewer
as 2:2016cv00488
Plaintiff:
Denver John Hart
Defendant:
Christine Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Brown, Jr. et al
as 1:2016cv01662
Petitioner:
John Hart
Respondent:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Jennifer Shaffer and Stu Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hart v. McMorris
as 2:2016cv00472
Plaintiff:
Denver John Hart
Defendant:
Ryan McMorris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Brown, Jr. et al
as 3:2016cv05928
Petitioner:
John Hart
Respondent:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Jennifer Shaffer and Stu Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hart v. Unum
as 3:2015cv00505
Plaintiff:
John Hart
Defendant:
Unum
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
United States of America v. The Estate of Lillian Grant and any known and unknown heirs and devisees of Russell and Lillian Grant et al
as 9:2014cv00285
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The Estate of Lillian Grant and any known and unknown heirs and devisees of Russell and Lillian Grant, Tami M. Hart, Randy Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Ray Chester Lewis v. Derral G. Adams, Warden
as 2:2008cv03527
Respondent:
Derall G Adams and John Hartely
Petitioner:
Ray Chester Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George Engman et al v. City of Ontario et al
as 5:2010cv00284
Plaintiff:
Andrea Braxter and George Engman
Defendant:
City of Ontario, City of Ontario Police Department, Does and others
Hamilton v. Hart et al
as 1:2010cv00272
Defendant:
John Hart, C. Prouty, R. Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis L. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
