Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Mungin v. Commonwealth of Virginia, et al.
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Michael Mungin
Defendant:
Unknown, Commonwealth of Virginia, S. Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
First v. Hockett, et al
as 23-5032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAN MARIE FIRST
Defendant / Appellee:
JUSTIN HOCKETT, JOHN PEARSON and CITY OF SALINA, OKLAHOMA
ZIPPY SHELL, INC. et al v. JOHN PEARSON et al
as 1:2022cv02191
Plaintiff:
ZIPPY SHELL, INC., RICK DEL SONTRO and GARETH TAYLOR
Defendant:
JOHN PEARSON and TENSAW INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
PEARSON v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05394
Plaintiff:
Steven Pearson and STEVEN JOHN PEARSON, III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Prochaska v. Contreraz et al
as 1:2020cv00101
Defendant:
John Pearson and Nathan Contreraz
Plaintiff:
Dalton Daniel Prochaska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEARSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv51177
Plaintiff:
JOHN PEARSON
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEARSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv40532
Plaintiff:
JOHN PEARSON
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
