Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Romero v. USA
as 1:2022cv00704
Petitioner:
Jose John Romero
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Church Of Ambrosia et al v. City Of Oakland et al
as 4:2022cv04655
Plaintiff:
CHURCH OF AMBROSIA and ZIDE DOOR CHURCH OF ENTHEOGENIC PLANTS
Defendant:
City Of Oakland, Oakland Police Department and JOHN ROMERO (AKA ERIC JOHN HENRY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Romero v. Adams County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2022cv02036
Plaintiff:
Carlos John Romero
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff Office, Laws, Burlinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROMERO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv37772
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROMERO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Romero-Rodriguez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas County)
as 8:2021cv01125
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections Secretary
Petitioner:
John Romero-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flaherty et al v. Amigos Del Mar Dive Shop et al
as 1:2020cv11485
Defendant:
Amigos Del Mar Dive Ship, John Doe, Maverick Avarello and others
Plaintiff:
Scuba Schools International, Daniel Flaherty, Albino Paz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. John Romero
as 18-50140
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN S. ROMERO, AKA John Romero, Sr.
USA v. Lloyd Romero
as 16-35740
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LLOYD JOHN ROMERO
Romero v. USA
as 1:2015cv00121
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lloyd John Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
LaPierre v. City of Lawrence, et al
as 15-1641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COUERDALENE LAPIERRE
Defendant - Appellee:
LAWRENCE, MA, JOHN ROMERO and KEVIN SLEDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
