Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Sofia Cano v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6200
Plaintiff:
SOFIA CANO
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRYAN P. STIRLING, DR. CHRIS KUNKLE and others
Taylor v. Ransom et al
as 1:2022cv02070
Plaintiff:
John Taylor
Defendant:
Kevin Ransom, J. Eyer, Dr. Prince and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CANO v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2022cv04247
Plaintiff:
SOFIA CANO
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan P. Stirling, DR. Chris Kunkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Charles Reed v. Sarah Kariko, et al
as 22-35616
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES VINCENT REED
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH KARIKO, Chief Medical Officer, Dept of Corrections, RYAN HERRINGTON, Medical Director, Stafford Creek, JEANETTE NEIBERT, Registered Health Information Technician, Stafford Creek CC and others
Taylor et al v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
Tammy Taylor and John Taylor
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Whiteville Correctional Facility, Felicia Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
John Taylor Morris, III
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk, Keith Harmon, Dareece Canady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. WELLINGTON et al
as 2:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
JOHN TAYLOR, IV
Defendant:
THOMAS WELLINGTON, C. COAKLEY, RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PASCHALL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE PASCHALL
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, IDOC, ROBERT CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PASCHALL v. CARTER et al
as 1:2021cv00369
Defendant:
DEVYN DICE, ROBERT CARTER, GWENDOLYN HORTH and others
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE PASCHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
