Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lucero v. Coppinger, et al
as 24-1050
Plaintiff:
MANUEL ROBERT LUCERO, V, STAFFORD GRAVELY, ALVAH PIKE and others
Defendant:
KEVIN COPPINGER, GEORGE GLYNOS, Individually and in their official capacities, KEVIN COPPINGER, Essex County Sheriff, individually and in his official capacity and others
Lucero et al v. Coppinger et al
as 1:2023cv10088
Plaintiff:
Manuel Robert Lucero, V., Robert Blanchette, James Williams and others
Defendant:
Kevin Coppinger, George Glynos and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Capital Realty Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01099
Plaintiff:
Jerry W. Moore
Defendant:
Capital Realty Group, Inc., Name-Unknown Owner(s) of St. John Towers Apts, Felecia Pryor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ALLEN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv00765
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
KELLY ALLEN and JOHN TOWER
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Figuereo et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12369
Plaintiff:
Ernest Velez, Anthony Valentino, Anthony J Yacopino and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Tower v. LA Carriers, LLC
as 2:2013cv06061
Plaintiff:
John Tower
Defendant:
LA Carriers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
White v. Robinson et al
as 4:2008cv02178
Plaintiff:
Garry Wayne White
Defendant:
Rodney Robinson, Jeremy Cagle, Mitz Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Angel et al v. American Homehealth, Inc. et al
as 8:2008cv00486
Plaintiff:
Garyn Angel, A.R. Angel Living Trust, Angel Family Trust and others
Defendant:
American Homehealth, Inc., Raul Leonides Lora, Raul Leonides Lora and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
