Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lewis v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv03066
Special Master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
John W. Lewis
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, Johnson & Johnson Inc and others
Interested Party:
Plaintiffs Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Young et al
as 7:2021cv00078
Plaintiff:
John W. Lewis
Defendant:
Sgt. Lisa Young and Lt. FNU Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2015cv03457
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. LEWIS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dickinson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02069
Plaintiff:
William E. Dickinson , Larry . Anderson , Verne R. Anderson and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dickinson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as CAN/3:12-cv-01199
Plaintiff:
William E. Dickinson , Larry . Anderson , Verne R. Anderson and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Inc. and others
Dickinson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01199
Plaintiff:
William E. Dickinson , Larry . Anderson , Verne R. Anderson and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY WILLIAM J. HIGGINS, JR.
as 3:2008cv00015
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. LEWIS
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY WILLIAM J. HIGGINS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Lewis et al
as 1:2007cv00567
Plaintiff:
Bruce Andrew Brown
Defendant:
John W. Lewis and Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
