Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Estate of Jada Johnson et al v. City Of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Estate of Jada Johnson, Maria Iwanski, L. J. and others
Defendant:
City Of Fayetteville, Timothy Rugg, Zacharius Borom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Dunlap-Banks v. City of Fayetteville, et al
as 5:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
Ja'Lana Dunlap-Banks
Defendant:
Fayetteville City Police Department, City of Fayetteville, Gina V. Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Doe 1 et al v. Varsity Brands LLC et al
as 6:2022cv02957
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3 and others
Defendant:
Varsity Brands LLC, Varsity Spirit LLC, Varsity Brands Holding Company Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DAY, JR. v. CANTELLANO et al
as 3:2019cv00231
Defendant:
Shane O'Neill, Dennis W. Shedd, Ryan S. Faulconer and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Charles Day, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Cantellano et al
as 3:2018cv00232
Plaintiff:
Charles Roger Day, Jr.
Defendant:
Patricia Espinoza Cantellano, John S. Davis, Neil H. McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv03807
Plaintiff:
Nicole Marie Smith
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Rosenberg & Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
HARRIS et al v. SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., et al
as 1:2012cv00378
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. HARRIS, III and ADRIANE L. HARRIS
Defendant:
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. , SUNTRUST BANKS INC. , SUNTRUST BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hudes v. Aetna Corp. et al
as 8:2009cv03383
Plaintiff:
Karen Hudes
Defendant:
Aetna Corp., Mark E. Schreiber and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
