Cases 1 - 10 of 237
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jonathan Smith v. Clark County District Attorney, et al
as 22-16223
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Family Support Division and INSKEEP, Child Support Enforcer
Smith v. Clark County, et al.,
as 2:2021cv01062
Defendant:
Inskeep, Clark County District Attorney Family Support Division and Jonathan Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Mills, et al
as 3:2019cv00906
Defendant:
Jonathan Lee Mills, Town of Waverly, Virginia and Derrick Banks
Plaintiff:
Vivian Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pierson v. Itawamba County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2019cv00085
Defendant:
Larry Johnson, Chris Dickinson, Other Unknown Persons and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Pierson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FILING ERROR
as 1:2019cv00286
Defendant:
University of Texas at San Antonio(UTSA), University of Texas (UT System) and Chief if Police Gerald Lewis
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Lee Richardson v. University of Texas Systems, et al
as 5:2019cv00271
Defendant:
The University of Texas System (UT System), The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA) and Chief of Police Gerald Lewis
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Aurora Police et al
as 1:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Aurora Police, John Bennett, Thomas P. Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Riches v. Abraham
as 1:2016cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Farrah Lynn Abraham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Riches v. Bitcoin et al
as 1:2016cv00019
Defendant:
Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto and Martti Malmi
Plaintiff:
Riches and Jonathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
