Cases 1 - 10 of 7,604
McElwee v. Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lloyd McElwee and Kenneth L. McElwee
Defendant:
Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc, Aldresgate United Methodist Retirement Community, Inc., William Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nicholson v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Leon Nicholson
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden Zook, D. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Eric Jones
as 24-4233
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ERIC RASHUN JONES, a/k/a E Dolla, a/k/a E
Gary Jones v. Darrell Moore
as 24-1390
Plaintiff:
GARY JONES
Defendant:
DARRELL MOORE, PAMELA LEE, MS. ALANA, (BCOPO) Chief's Secretary and others
Brown v. Dorsett, et al
as 1:2024cv00738
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Brown
Defendant:
Captain Dorsett, Officer Jarmon and Garry Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wrenn v. Williamson et al
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Simone Wrenn
Defendant:
Kiara Williamson, DaJour Jones, Deborah Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv01293
Petitioner:
Thomas Linwood Jones
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Sharon Lynn Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
AlBritton v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
DeVinche Javon AlBritton
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Counselor Kayla Mallory, David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
