Cases 41 - 50 of 703
United States v. Diaz-De La Cruz
as 23-5055
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RODRIGO JAVIER DIAZ-DE LA CRUZ, AKA Jose T. Gonzalez
US v. Gonzalez-Rivera
as 23-1418
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE LUIS GONZALEZ-RIVERA
De Felipe Cervantes v. Garland
as 21-6415
Petitioner:
MARISOL DE FELIPE CERVANTES and JOSE MANUEL GONZALEZ MARTINES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Philip Petrone, et al v. Werner Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 23-1886
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Philip Petrone, Stewart Fisher, Jasbir Singh and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Werner Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Werner Trucking and Drivers Management, LLC
Gonzalez v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv05042
Plaintiff:
Jose M Gonzalez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gonzalez Murillo v. Garland
as 22-1217
Petitioner:
JOSE GUSTAVO GONZALEZ MURILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Gonzalez-Salazar
as 23-40227
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Antonio Gonzalez-Salazar
USA v. Gonzalez-Salazar
as 23-40226
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Antonio Gonzalez-Salazar
Roosevelt Espinosa et al v. CEVA Freight, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Espinosa, Fidelis Abaekobe, William Aguilar and others
Defendant:
CEVA Freight, LLC and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Gonzalez Tzaj et al v. 1567 Lex Cafe Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Gonzalez Tzaj, Joaquin Antonio Pea Rivera and Joaquin Antonio Pena Rivera
Defendant:
1567 Lex Cafe Corp. doing business as Effy's Kitchen, 1688 York Cafe Corporation doing business as Effys Cafe on York and Shlomo Alkoby
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
