Cases 1 - 10 of 586
Gomez Cruz et al v. Ding Feng Lin Construction LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02657
Plaintiff:
Jose Reynaldo Perez, Jose Esposorio Gomez Cruz, Junior and others
Defendant:
Ding Feng Lin Construction LLC doing business as Ding Feng Lin Construction LLC and He Shun Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Perez v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Jose L Perez
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Holt et al v. Maduro Moros et al
as 1:2024cv20701
Plaintiff:
Joshua Holt, Thamara B Holt, Derek Holt and others
Defendant:
Nicolas Maduro Moros, Cartel of the Suns, Vladimir Padrino Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
In re: 9000 SW 63RD COURT LLC, et al
as 24-10503
Petitioner:
In re: 9000 SW 63RD COURT LLC, 6301 COLLINS AVE 1008 LLC and SAMARK LOPEZ BELLO
Respondent:
CARLOS EDUARDO MARRON, JANE DOE, C.R., A Minor and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06092
Plaintiff:
Jose David Perez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
