Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Palmer, et al v. Specialty Surgery Center, PLLC, et al
as 17-1005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES PALMER and MICHELLE PALMER
Plaintiff:
SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER, PLLC, d/b/a Specialty Surgery Center, KENNETH R. LISTER and KENNETH R. LISTER
Defendant:
FULLERTON ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY MEDICAL GROUP, INC., ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC, BARRY J. CADDEN and others
Interested Party:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PHARMACY, EMORY CLINIC, INC., VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY and others
Trustee:
PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center and LYNNE F. RILEY
Intervenor:
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Norris, et al v. Specialty Surgery Center, PLLC, et al
as 17-1003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOCELYN KAE NORRIS
Plaintiff:
SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER, PLLC, d/b/a Specialty Surgery Center, KENNETH R. LISTER and KENNETH LISTER, M.D., P.C.
Defendant:
LINDA LUI LUONG, FULLERTON ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY MEDICAL GROUP, INC., ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC and others
Interested Party:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PHARMACY, EMORY CLINIC, INC., VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY and others
Trustee:
PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center and LYNNE F. RILEY
Intervenor:
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Norris v. Specialty Surgery Center, PLLC, et al
as 17-1003
Interested Party:
PLAINTIFFS' STEERING COMMITTEE, INTERVENTIONAL SPINE & SPORTS MEDICINE, PC, MICHAEL D. O'NEAL and others
Defendant:
ADIL KATABAY, ANDREW HOWDEN, PREMIER ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES SURGICAL CENTER, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARKO, GLADYS G. AUSTIN, ROSANNE BROOKS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOCELYN KAE NORRIS
Trustee:
PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center and LYNNE F. RILEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER, PLLC, d/b/a Specialty Surgery Center, KENNETH LISTER, M.D., P.C. and KENNETH R. LISTER
Ramos v. Capital One, N.A et al
as 7:2017cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Ramos
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A. , HSBC Card Services Inc. and HSBC Technology & Services (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jose Cruz Ramos et al v. El Paso-Los Angeles Limousine Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07104
Defendant:
Martin Aguirre, Does, El Paso-Los Angeles Limousine Express, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Cruz Ramos
Ramos-Gonzalez et al v. Tormos-Pol et al
as 3:2013cv01882
Plaintiff:
Jose O. Ramos-Gonzalez, Yolanda Toyos-Olascoaga and Ramos Gonzales & Toyos Olascoaga CSP
Defendant:
Lee Marie Tormos-Pol , Otto Carretero and Conjugal Partnership Carretero-Tormos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Juarbe Gonzalez et al v. Hospital Bella Vista et al
as 3:2013cv01759
Plaintiff:
Israel Juarbe-Gonzalez , Jose Juarbe-Ramos and Ismael Juarbe-Ramos
Defendant:
Hospital Bella Vista, Juan Suris, Jorge Justiniano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tormos Pol v. Toyos Olascoaga et al
as 3:2013cv01696
Plaintiff:
Lee M Tormos-Pol
Defendant:
Yolanda V Toyos-Olascoaga, Jose O Ramos-Gonzalez, Antonio J Amadeo-Murga and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv16403
Plaintiff:
Norma Ramos and Jose Luis Ramos
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RAMOS v. NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING PHARMACY, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv10410
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Ramos
Defendant:
New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. , Ameridose LLC , Alaunus Pharmaceutical, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
