Cases 41 - 50 of 719
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Garcia Hernandez v. Garland
as 23-6108
Petitioner:
YEUDY JOSE GARCIA HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Juan Garcia, et al v. County of Napa, et al
as 23-15056
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN GARCIA, Deceased, through his Co-Successors In Interest, AG and EG, EVA LOPEZ HERNANDEZ, Individually, and as Next Friend to Co-Successors in Interest, EDUARDO DANIEL LOPEZ RAMIREZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF NAPA and NAPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S SERGEANT DAVID ACKMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv03042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Garcia v. Chevalier et al
as 3:2022cv01328
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia
Defendant:
Darren Chevalier, Mclain, Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Garcia-Duarte
as 22-50922
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Garcia-Duarte
Noguera v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00457
Petitioner:
Jose Garcia Noguera
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garcia v. Hallah Food Emporium Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05607
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia
Defendant:
Hallah Food Emporium Inc. doing business as Tanjawi Market, Mohammed Tamimi and Rachid Tamimi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Garcia Aquino v. Polanco
as 1:2022cv05553
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia Aquino
Defendant:
Nilson Polanco doing business as Nilson Construction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
