Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Birrell, et al., v. Fox, et al.,
as 2:2016cv01818
Plaintiff:
David Wesley Birrell , Raymond D. Jackson, Sr. , Sidney Ross Deegan, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Robert W. Fox, Joseph A. Bick, M. Cordero-Boucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bick Holdings Inc. et al v. United States Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 4:2013cv00462
Plaintiff:
James Patrick Bick, Jr. , Bick Group, Inc. , William Joseph Bick and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius , U.S. Department of Health and Human Services , U.S. Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnold v. Ulatowski et al
as 12-1724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David William Arnold
Defendant - Appellee:
Damian Ulatowski, Supervisor of the Town of Clay, Robert Edick, Deputy Supervisor, Naomi Bray, Councilwoman and others
Roderick Mitchell v. Roxan Sanders, et al
as 10-16929
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODERICK L. MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
ROXAN SANDERS, MANUEL SABIN, M. WHITNEY and others
Arnold v. Ulatowski et al
as 5:2010cv01043
Plaintiff:
David William Arnold
Defendant:
Damian Ulatowski, Robert Edick, Naomi Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Williams et al
as 2:2010cv01829
Plaintiff:
Lacy Mitchell
Defendant:
Williams, Joseph A. Bick and R. L. Andreasen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Williams et al
as 2:2009cv00545
Plaintiff:
Lacy Mitchell
Defendant:
Williams, Joseph A. Bick and R.L. Andreasen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mitchell v. Sanders et al
as 2:2008cv02284
Plaintiff:
Roderick L Mitchell
Defendant:
Roxanne Sanders, Manuel Sabin, M Whitney and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anthony Sharp v. Joseph Bick
as 08-16648
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY ANDRE SHARP
Respondent - Appellee:
JOSEPH A. BICK
Mitchell v. Williams et al
as 2:2008cv01630
Plaintiff:
Lacy Mitchell
Defendant:
Williams, Joseph A. Bick and R. L. Andreasen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
