Cases 11 - 20 of 89
MORGAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01951
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FRANCIS MORGAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Avery v. St. Germain, et al
as 22-1971
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDGAR CLIFFORD AVERY, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
ASHLYN ST. GERMAIN, DONNA STYEK, BRIAN CASHMAN and others
LAWRENCE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08935
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FRANCIS LAWRENCE, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lau et al v. ZTE Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01855
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Rosebrock, Christopher Jason Rozanski, David William Haalili Lau and others
Defendant:
ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc., ZTE (TX) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Francis v. Internal Revenue Service
as 4:2021cv04100
Plaintiff:
Joseph Francis
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NASAL v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv01522
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FRANCIS NASAL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nasal v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv02192
Plaintiff:
Joseph Francis Nasal
Defendant:
3M Company, 3M Occupational Safety, LLC, Aearo Holding, LLC and others
Avery v. St. Germain et al
as 1:2021cv00662
Petitioner:
Edgar Clifford Avery, Jr.
Respondent:
Ashlyn St. Germain, Donna Styek, Brian Cashman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NANSEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10472
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FRANCIS NANSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nesbitt v. Cumpagna et al
as 0:2020cv04193
Defendant:
Mr. M. Chartier, Sergeant Francis, Capt. Pendergrass and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Nesbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
