Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Finley v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv02194
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Finley
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, SCI Waymart, Patrick Hebert and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
McCain v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2012cv00789
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Keri Moore, James C. Barnacle and others
Plaintiff:
John McCain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roger Thomas v. Joseph Nish
as 11-3563
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER LEE THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH NISH and ATTY GEN PA
THOMAS v. NISH et al
as 2:2011cv00933
Petitioner:
ROGER LEE THOMAS
Respondent:
JOSEPH NISH and WILLIAM RYAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Nish et al
as 1:2011cv00599
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Thomas
Respondent:
Joseph Nish and William Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodney Ash v. Joseph Nish, et al
as 10-4620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY ASH
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH NISH, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
ANDERSON v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv05604
Plaintiff:
JOSH LEE ANDERSON
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, JOSEPH J. PIAZZA, DAVID A. VARANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2010cv00584
Petitioner:
Eugene L Harrison
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Daniel Dragwa, Joseph Nish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. Nish
as 3:2009cv03948
Petitioner:
JOHN JOSEPH PERRY
Respondent:
JOSEPH NISH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. Nish
as 3:2009cv01481
Petitioner:
John Joseph Perry
Respondent:
Joseph Nish and Attorney General Of The State Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
