Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Peterson v. State of Idaho Social Security Administration
as 1:2026cv00550
Plaintiff:
Joseph Peterson
Defendant:
State of Idaho Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Eliason
as 1:2026cv00523
Plaintiff:
Joseph Peterson
Defendant:
Dr. Eliason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2026cv00524
Plaintiff:
Joseph Peterson
Defendant:
State of Idaho and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. State of Idaho
as 1:2026cv00473
Plaintiff:
Joseph Peterson
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Baird
as 1:2025cv00690
Defendant:
Baird
Petitioner:
Joseph Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Nicholas Peterson
as 25-1788
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nicholas Joseph Peterson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1786
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HCI Distribution, Inc., et al v. Douglas Peterson, et al
as 23-2311
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HCI Distribution, Inc. and Rock River Manufacturing, Inc.
Defendant:
Douglas Joseph Peterson, Nebraska Attorney General and Tony Fulton, Nebraska Tax Commissioner
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Hilgers, Nebraska Attorney General and Glen A. White, Interim Nebraska Tax Commissioner
WADDELL et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Aaron Waddell, Abreka Regues, Albert Sidney Palmer and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Peterson v. Day et al
as 2:2021cv02027
Plaintiff:
Joseph Peterson
Defendant:
Travis Day
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
