Cases 1 - 10 of 100
WILDER v. SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES/JPAY et al
as 4:2026cv00410
Plaintiff:
RAYNARD-DEANCO WILDER
Defendant:
SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES/JPAY, UNITED STATES PERSON, THE EARTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilder v. Securus Technologies/JPay et al
as 4:2026cv00921
Plaintiff:
Raynard-Deanco Wilder
Defendant:
Securus Technologies/JPay, United States Person, The Earth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS), et al
as 1:2026cv05855
Plaintiff:
Henry Cox
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS),, Office of Special Investigations and JPay LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Arnold, et al
as 26-2510
Plaintiff:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant:
LLOYD ARNOLD, Indiana Commissioner, CRYSTAL RAUPP, E.J.S.P. Asst. Admin, KAREN PARKER FOREMAN, E.J.S.P. Asst. Admin and others
Morra v. Tolbert et al
as 6:2026cv00773
Plaintiff:
William J. Morra, Jr.
Defendant:
Librarian C. Tolbert, Nurse Practitioner Medical Department & Pharmacy, Jpay Securius and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Franklin v. US, et al
as 26-10840
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA FRANKLIN
Defendant:
US, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES and others
Moore #337243 v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2026cv01264
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Aaron Moore and Maddi Moore
Defendant:
Katie Hobbs, Kris Mayes, Joseph W Malka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Claiborne v. JPay Corp. et al
as 3:2026cv00119
Plaintiff:
Tyel Claiborne
Defendant:
JPay Corp., Securus, LLC./JPay, LLC., Sussex II State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. JPay
as 1:2026cv00819
Plaintiff:
Henry Cox
Defendant:
JPay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
