Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Gonzalez v. Constellium Muscle Shoals LLC
as 4:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Juan Miguel Placeres Gonzalez
Defendant:
Constellium Muscle Shoals LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Soto v. Strayhorn et al
as 2:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Francisco Soto
Defendant:
Cole Strayhorn, Letron Tate, Juan Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv00918
Plaintiff:
Juan Contreras
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClendon v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 4:2022cv00867
Plaintiff:
Juan McClendon
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Vasques-Garcia v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04097
Plaintiff:
Juan Vasques-Garcia
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Tri-National Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Jackie Renea Carr
Defendant:
Tri-National Inc and Juan Manuel Ramos, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Rivera v. Does
as 4:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Rivera
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Yates
as 2:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Rios
Defendant:
John Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ruelas et al v. Hendricks et al
as 3:2022cv00057
Defendant:
Rodney Hendricks, Sarah Roetzel, Rodney A Hendricks and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Ruelas and Christina Ruelas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
McClendon v. Bernard et al
as 4:2021cv00823
Plaintiff:
Juan McClendon
Defendant:
Steven Bernard, Charisse Childers and Arkansas Division of Workforce Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
