Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Rubio v. USA
as 3:2020cv01620
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Gonzalez Rubio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Gonzalez-Rubio
as 20-3056
Defendant / Appellant:
Juan Carlos Gonzalez-Rubio, AKA Juanco, AKA Chamalet
Defendant:
Noe Castro, AKA Noe Castro Buelna
Appellee:
United States of America
Gonzalez Cuautle et al v. 45 Tudor Restaurant LLC et al
as 1:2020cv04250
Defendant:
Mirsad Lekic, Mirso Lekic, Aida Lekic and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Amaro Hernandez, Luiciano Reyes Ramon, Juan Carlos Gonzalez Cuautle and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GONZALEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv04034
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JUAN CARLOS GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIBSON v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03245
Plaintiff:
CECIL GILBERT, DARIUS HART, DEVONTE SHEROD HARRIS and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02212
Plaintiff:
Cecil Gilbert, Darius Hart, Devonte Sherod Harris and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, Does 1-50, 3M Company and others
Gonzalez v. ABC Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv07302
Defendant:
John Does, Keiju Chen, ABC Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
GONZALEZ v. WARDEN
as 3:2018cv00153
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzalez v. EAGLE CAPITAL INVESTMENT CORP. et al
as 1:2018cv22128
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Gonzalez
Defendant:
Eagle Capital Investment Corp. and Patrick Aguila
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
USA v. Juan Gonzalez-Vargas
as 18-40205
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS GONZALEZ-VARGAS, also known as Sealed11
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
