Cases 1 - 10 of 12
McPherson v. Benedict et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Brentrez Jarmykus McPherson and Royal Great Levi King - Chief Levi Priest Yaheshiah
Defendant:
Pope Benedict, Department of Corrections, Georgia Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mujahid v. Roberts
as 22-60652
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Talib Mujahid
Defendant / Appellee:
Julia Roberts, Associate Warden
Mujahid v. Roberts
as 1:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Talib Mujahid
Defendant:
Julia Roberts
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. Roberts et al
as 1:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Julia Roberts, Jake Tapper, Steven Bo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00366
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Banuelos et al v. Ryan et al
as 4:2020cv00080
Defendant:
Julia Roberts, Unknown Parties, Charles L Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Armando Banuelos, Uriel Banuelos and Margarita Banuelos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. N.Y.P.D. D.O.T. et al
as 1:2020cv00073
Defendant:
All Record Compye's, Barock Obama, Jay-Z Rapper and others
Plaintiff:
Romial Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forister #301007 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2019cv00045
Defendant:
Unknown Salyer, Julia Roberts, Unknown Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Steven Forister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morton v. Bullock et al
as 1:2018cv25392
Defendant:
Julia Roberts, Eastwood Clinton and Sandra Bullock
Plaintiff:
Jimmy N. Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Randall v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2018cv00519
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Scott Frederick Randall
Defendant:
Julia Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
