Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Whittington v. St. Dominic-Jackson Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Justin Adam Whittington
Defendant:
St. Dominic-Jackson Memorial Hospital and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Marsh et al v. Roth et al
as 2:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Sandra Marsh and Justin Adams
Defendant:
David Roth, St. Johnsbury Sugarworks OZ Business LLC and Cary & Main Co., LLC
Other:
ENE Evaluator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv28300
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN ADAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peterson v. Lee County Sheriff et al
as 2:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Jessie James Peterson, Jr.
Defendant:
Lee County Sheriff, Dave Jennings, Justine Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Byrd v. Livingston County Jail
as 6:2022cv06422
Plaintiff:
Justin Adam Byrd
Defendant:
Livingston County Jail, Zach Scott, Deputy Fennell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MACCLANAHAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16361
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN ADAM MACCLANAHAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BARTLEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14389
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN ADAM BARTLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BLACKBURN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11809
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN ADAM BLACKBURN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States v. Adams
as 22-2071
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAIN JUSTIN ADAMS
Heard v. eStem Jr High et al
as 4:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Tamara Heard
Defendant:
eStem Jr High, John Bacon and Justin Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
