Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Davis v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jack A. Davis
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Chris West, John Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Williams et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00215
Plaintiff:
Jack A. Davis
Defendant:
John Williams, Captain Rogers and Dr. Kern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00227
Plaintiff:
Jack G. Davis and Rosalie A. Davis
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. James, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jack A. Davis
Defendant:
Nurse James, John Williams and Lt. Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as TXW/1:14-cv-01143
Plaintiff:
Jack G. Davis and Rosalie A. Davis
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC , Janssen Ortho LLC , Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Davis et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01143
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare AG and others
Plaintiff:
Jack G. Davis and Rosalie A. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Davis et al
as 1:2013cv00695
Defendant:
Jack D. Davis, Scioto County Treasurer, Ohio State of and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Davis v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 4:2013cv02139
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Jack Duane Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Davis v. Holzipfel
as 1:2012cv00257
Plaintiff:
Jack Denver Davis
Defendant:
Leonard Holzipfel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Holzipfel
as 2:2012cv00612
Plaintiff:
Jack Denver Davis
Defendant:
Leonard Holzipfel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
