Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Chapman v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv01042
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant:
Donald Allen, FNU Boyd, Joshua Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. GNH Electric, LLC. et al
as 6:2023cv02004
Plaintiff:
Jack Collins
Defendant:
GNH Electric, LLC., Elite AC, LLC. and Gadi Ohayon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jack Collins, III v. MN
as 22-3583
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jack Collins, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Minnesota
Jack Collins, III v. State of Florida
as 22-3538
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jack Collins, III
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Florida
Collins v. Minnesota
as 0:2022cv02984
Plaintiff:
Jack Collins, III
Defendant:
Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins v. State of Florida
as 0:2022cv02818
Plaintiff:
Jack Collins, III
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins et al v. City of Galveston, Texas et al
as 3:2018cv00198
Plaintiff:
Leisa Collins and Bobby Jack Collins
Defendant:
City of Galveston, Texas and Evan Sumner Fraley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re Big Heart Pet Brands Litigation
as 4:2018cv00861
Defendant:
Big Heart Pet Brands, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maclain Mullins, Joyce Brown, Vivian Jilek and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Thomas Roupe, Neil Sebastiano, Nancy Sturm and others
Consolidated Defendant:
The J.M. Smucker Company,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodney Harris v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv03859
Plaintiff:
Rodney Harris
Defendant:
City of Chicago, John "Jack" Collins, Star No. 40146, Reyes, Star No. 40210 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Swanson et al
as 0:2014cv04799
Plaintiff:
Jack Collins
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Angela Helseth Kiese and State of Minnesota Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
