Cases 1 - 10 of 150
Stanley v. United States of America, et al.
as 23-4210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON LEE STANLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JACK FOX, Warden
Fox v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jack Fox
Defendant:
BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Harold Lewis Chaney v. Jack Fox
as 2:2022cv09428
Petitioner:
Harold Lewis Chaney
Respondent:
Jack Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Keith Blackwell v. Dhaliwal Jaspal, et al
as 20-55198
Defendant / Appellee:
M. LIN, Clinical Director, RUDY LEYVES, DHALIWAL JASPAL, M.D. and others
Defendant:
Y. CARLON, STEVE LANGFORD, JACK FOX and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH L. BLACKWELL
Banks v. USA et al
as 1:2019cv00583
Defendant:
D (I) Murton, Jack (I) Fox, J (I) Kammrad and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Joseph Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv
David Conrad v. Jack Fox, et al
as 18-56001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID CONRAD
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK FOX, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX LOMPOC CA and others
Stine v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2018cv00644
Plaintiff:
Mikeal G. Stine
Defendant:
No Named Defendants
Interested_party:
Jack Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fox v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv00680
Plaintiff:
Jack Fox
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cole v. U.S Department of Justice et al.
as 1:2018cv00482
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Cole
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, ADX Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yarbrough v. Fox et al
as 1:2018cv00399
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Yarbrough
Defendant:
Jack Fox, U.S. Parole Commission and U.S. Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
