Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimmy Glenn, et al v. Cleveland Brothers, Inc., et al
as 22-10680
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMY GLENN, ESTATE OF ANDERSON CHILDS and ROBIN CHILDS
Defendant / Appellee:
CLEVELAND BROTHERS, INC., TIMOTHY WOODSON, Administrator of the Estate of Doctor Woodson, JUDGE and others
Walker v. Credit Collection Partners, Inc.
as 3:2021cv03176
Plaintiff:
Jacob A. Walker
Defendant:
Credit Collection Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Canada v. Walker et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2021cv00418
Defendant:
Jay Jones, Jacob A. Walker, III and Steven T. Marshall
Plaintiff:
Marquerious Laquez Canada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2021cv00133
Defendant:
Jacob A. Walker, III, Steven T. Marshall, Jay Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Omar Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glenn et al v. Cleveland Brothers, Inc. et al(MAG+)
as 3:2020cv00957
Plaintiff:
Robin Childs, Jimmy Glenn and Estate of Anderson Childs
Defendant:
Cleveland Brothers, Inc., Timothy Woodson, Jacob A. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sunday v. Walker et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2020cv00491
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Sunday
Defendant:
Jacob A. Walker, III, Deborah Toney and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walker v. Assureity, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10436
Defendant:
Car Guard Administration, Inc., Payment Plans Plus, LLC, William R Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob A Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Darrell Wimberly v. Charles Nesmith, et al
as 14-10324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL WIMBERLY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES EUGENE NESMITH, SPEAKMAN, JAY JONES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
