Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rebeca Aplonia Gross et al v. Susanne S. Cho et al
as 5:2023cv02637
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Apolonia Gross, Z. T. B. and L. R. R. W.
Defendant:
Susanne S. Cho, Natalie M.P. Lough, Elizabth E. Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. David Mitchell
as 23-10231
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID JACOB MITCHELL
RANDLE v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv05134
Plaintiff:
ANWAR RANDLE
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Officer Robert Guerra, Star No. 11109, Officer Vincent Crider, Star No. 6554 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blynn v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00534
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Jacob Mitchell Blynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv78505
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JACOB MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Thompson et al
as 2:2019cv00069
Defendant:
Sheridan County Sheriff, Rena M. Hyman PC Attorney, Barney & Graham LLC Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Jacob Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dabrney v. Turnkey et al
as 4:2017cv00513
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edward Dabrney
Defendant:
Turnkey, Jacob Mitchell, Willam Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Browning v. Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv00292
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Browning
Defendant:
Johnson, Humphry, J Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Jacob Mitchell
as 16-4399
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JACOB MITCHELL
Arron Lewis v. Charles Holladay, et al
as 16-2202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Arron Michael Lewis
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles Holladay, "Doc" Sheriff, Pulaski COunty Sheriff's Department, Carl Johnson, M.D., Doctor, Pulaski County Jail, Sarah Speer, Registered Nurse, Pulaski County Jail and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
