Cases 21 - 30 of 33
United States v. James Robinson
as 12-1618
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
James Robinson, also known as Richie
Poole v. Dayton et al
as 0:2012cv00441
Plaintiff:
James Robinson Poole
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Lori Swanson, Cal Ludeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv01019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2011cv01092
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Woods
as 4:2010cv01389
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Alice Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv01920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Donovan Robinson, etc. v. Jessica Symmes, etc.
as 08-3033
Petitioner - Appellant:
Donovan J. Robinson, Donovan James Robinson, Suing as
Respondent - Appellee:
Jessica Symmes, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnny Spurlock v. Ashley County, et al
as 07-1917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Johnny Spurlock
Defendant - Appellee:
Ashley County, Arkansas, a subordinate political entity in the State of AR, James Robinson, Sheriff in his individual & official capacities, Homer McDougle, in his individual and official capacities and others
Defendant:
C. V. Christmas, in his individual & official capacities and Don White, in his individual and official capacity
Coleman v. Robinson et al
as 1:2007cv01006
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E Coleman
Defendant:
James Robinson, David Oliver and Willie Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
