Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ward, III v. Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
James V. Ward, III
Defendant:
Lansing, City of, Joseph Traverso, Damon Pulver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Ward v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01899
Plaintiff:
James E Ward
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward v. Henderson County Detention Center
as 4:2020cv00093
Plaintiff:
James William Ward
Defendant:
Henderson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward #614839 v. Sprader
as 2:2019cv00079
Respondent:
Scott Sprader
Petitioner:
James Virgil Ward #614839, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ward v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00930
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
James M. Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hensley, et. al. v. Conner, et. al. (PLR1)
as 3:2018cv00173
Thirdparty_defendant:
Tennessee Valley Authority , Beverly Seaton, Elmer Seaton and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Hensley
Defendant:
Timothy Conner, Debra Conner, Ed Housley and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Ed Housley and Sherri Housley
Counter_defendant:
Scott Hensley
Cross_defendant:
Timothy Conner, Debra Conner, Ed Housley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00061
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
In re: James Ward
as 11-8068
Debtor:
In re: JAMES V. WARD
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MCHUGH, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES V. WARD
Moore v. Diesel Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00907
Plaintiff:
Joe H Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Diesel Express, Inc. and James E. Ward, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
