Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Modacure v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2020cv00476
Plaintiff:
Devon Modacure
Defendant:
James E. Davis, Kenneth Short, II, Cobey Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv55510
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES E DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Russell et al v Wayne County, et al
as 2:2020cv11094
Defendant:
James E Davis, Wayne County, Michigan, Robert Dunlap and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Smelley, CalDerone Pearson, Harry White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv14385
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES E DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv14382
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES E DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bullock et al vs LaSalle County, et al.
as 1:2020cv00457
Plaintiff:
James E Davis and Dion V Bullock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Benham v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2019cv00911
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Mississippi and James E. Davis
Plaintiff:
Philip Benham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. RI DCYF
as 19-2173
Defendant / Appellee:
RI DEPARTMENT FOR CHILDREN, YOUTH AND THEIR FAMILIES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES E. DAVIS
Davis et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
as 3:2019cv02444
Plaintiff:
James E Davis, Lori Davis and James Davis
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth and Families
as 1:2019cv00390
Plaintiff:
James E. Davis
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth and Families
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
