Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Samuel James Gill v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv05643
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel James Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv10632
Plaintiff:
JAMES GILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith et al v. Warden et al
as 2:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Osuntoka Smith, Andre D Hansbrough, Toney Davis and others
Defendant:
Warden, D Blackburn, Justin Segerstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv48694
Plaintiff:
JAMES GILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arden et al v. National Association of Medical Examiners, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00991
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L Arden and Arden Forensics, PC
Defendant:
National Association of Medical Examiners, Inc., Sally Aiken, John Scott Denton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Javontai Thames v. James Gill
as 20-13299
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAVONTAI THAMES
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES GILL
DAVEY v. INCH et al
as 3:2020cv05766
Defendant:
Officer scott torres, Sergeant Frederick Fuller, Officer JAMES GILL and others
Plaintiff:
Personal Rep Catherine Davey and CATHERINE DAVEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ELLIS v. INCH
as 3:2020cv05723
Plaintiff:
KEITH S ELLIS
Defendant:
MARK S INCH, LIEUTENANT, WALKER CLEMMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEEKS v. INCH
as 1:2020cv00171
Respondent:
MARK S INCH and JAMES GILL
Petitioner:
JAY ALAN MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DEMPS v. INCH
as 4:2020cv00399
Respondent:
MARK S INCH and JAMES GILL
Petitioner:
WILLIAM JAMAL DEMPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
