Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Grimes v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq01345
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
James Grimes
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grimes v. Watts, et al
as 23-2144
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES GRIMES
Defendant / Appellee:
KATRINA WATTS, SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE, JOE MCSHERRY and others
Grimes v. Wats et al
as 1:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Grimes
Defendant:
Katrina Wats, Shell Point Mortgage, Joe McSherry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Grimes v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00718
Petitioner:
Clifton James Grimes
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00705
Plaintiff:
James Grimes
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
McCool et al v. Ardent Health Services Management Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01158
Defendant:
Ardent Health Services Management Company, Inc., Ardent Health Services LLC, Ashley Crabtree and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn MacDonald, Warren Harlan and Mark McCool
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Grimes v. Bowers
as 7:2022cv00022
Petitioner:
Clifton James Grimes
Respondent:
Warden Rodger Bowers and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRIMES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv01089
Plaintiff:
JAMES GRIMES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Grimes v. Lopze
as 7:2022cv00020
Petitioner:
Clifton James Grimes
Respondent:
Warden John Lopze
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. Bowers
as 4:2022cv00187
Petitioner:
Clifton James Grimes
Defendant:
Warden Rodger Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
